NavigationBreaking NewsLatest News Articles Latest Audio Human Interest Opinion/Analysis Interviews Site TopicsMiscellaneousPalestinian Politics Lebanon war The Wall Palestinian attacks Refugees/Immigration Holy sites Non-violent action Israeli Politics Diplomacy Prisoners Israeli Settlement Human rights Israeli attacks Peace process International Politics Jerusalem English Audio Report Internal Unrest Italian Audio Report Truce Boycott Divestment user preferences
|
Or use the Paypal Donation buttons on the left column
Recent Articles about West Bank Human rights
No computerized card for a one-handed reporter Apr 21 09 PCHR slams Israel's kidnapping of legislators, political leaders Mar 19 09 Latest News ArticlesIsraeli sub crosses the Egyptian Suez Peninsula. 11:01 Sat 04 Jul Bahraini officials arrive in Israel to take five Bahraini nationals back home 10:24 Sat 04 Jul Israel cuts off water to Arab Druze towns on hottest day of year 01:49 Sat 04 Jul Israel pledges to compensate UN for shelling its facilities in Gaza 23:53 Fri 03 Jul Three children diagnosed with swine-flu 23:31 Fri 03 Jul Soldiers attack the Nil'in weekly Protest 17:26 Fri 03 Jul Three Injured during the weekly Bil'in protest 16:13 Fri 03 Jul Israeli Housing Minister Concerned over increasing Arab population 11:32 Fri 03 Jul Soldiers wound a Palestinian woman at a roadblock in the Jordan valley 08:04 Fri 03 Jul Soldiers break into the Al Aqsa Mosque yard, kidnap three Palestinians 05:37 Fri 03 Jul Full StoryAfter a petition filed by human rights groups, High Court suspends proceedings in Nil’lin caseAshraf Abu Rahma, the Palestinian resident who was shot by the soldiers after they bounded and blindfolded him, filed a petition along with Israeli Human Rights groups; B’Tselem, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, and Yesh Din, against the Judge Advocate General's decision to prosecute the battalion commander, Lt. Col. Omri Borberg, and the soldier who fired the shot, Staff Sgt. L, for “unbecoming conduct”, the High Court issued a decree nisi, forcing the Judge Advocate General to justify his decision, B’Tselem reported. The court also decided to suspend the military court until a decision is made on the petition. The petition was written by attorneys Limor Yehuda and Dan Yakir of ACRI. The petitioners demanded the court to change the decision against the soldier due to the severity of the offense he carried out when he shot and wounded the bound detainee. They stated that this act constitutes an abuse against a detainee in aggravated circumstances, and added that the punishment for such an offense is imprisonment for seven years. “The petitioners strongly condemn the handling of the matter by the Judge Advocate General (JAG), arguing that the light offense chosen indicates a weak response by the JAG's Office: “It transmits to officers and other soldiers an extremely grave message of contempt for human life, and paves the way for future cases. . . It is hard to avoid the conclusion that a systemic defect is involved, one that has spread not only among IDF officers but also among those responsible for enforcing law and order in the army”. B’Tselem reported. The petitioners said that with its light sentence against the soldier, the military prosecution is setting a dangerous precedent which could lead to similar shootings. “The petitioners contend that the decision to file a light indictment is unreasonable in the extreme, this also in light of Borberg's senior rank”, B’Tselem added. Yet, the decision actually transfers the commander from his position to another role in the corps but he will keep his rank as a lieutenant colonel, and will be able to get promoted in the future as the ruling does not hinder ay future promotion. The petitioners also said that the Israeli Army Chief of Staff, Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi showed leniency towards the officer who shot the bound detainee when he said that he “does not see any reason that would prevent the promotion of the commander in the future”, he also said that the commander will return to his position in the army. The human rights groups said that the officer in question is also suspected of similar attacks and abuse against other detainees, which also could imply that he allowed similar abuse cases against other detainees. The groups added that although the soldier understood that he was given an order to shoot the bound detainee, he should have used judgment as this order was unethical and illegal. |